|
What About . . .
Ohio State Police Officers Lying under Oath,
to FRAME someone for a crime that exists' ONLY when they edit, revise, and manipulate the facts to fit their half-baked theories!
This was done at the request someone employed by a Managed Care Organization named SHEAKLEY!
Sheakley is a privately owned corporation that uses the Ohio State Police as their own private 'Investigative and Persecution Bureau'.
Why do the Ohio State Police take marching orders from a Privately Owned Corporation?
My life has been destroyed because these two perfidious officers decided
that they could perjure themselves with impunity, and they did so; repeatedly, and in writing.
These two officers' names are:
Donald R. Campbell,
&
Kenneth M. Featherling.
I hereby swear under pen-alty of perjury; that this is a true and factual statement.
Charles J. Eubanks
I went to the Department of Justice, The FBI, even my Elected Representatives, no-body it seems is interested in justice but I want...
I NEED...
I DEMAND justice!
This entire situation exists because a cottage industry* has developed around the Ohio Bureau of Workers Com-pensation, One whose sole purpose is to deny benefits due to injured workers.
(*The Managed Care Organization)
Everything they do (The MCO) is focused on denying these benefits from the injured workers. The denial of these benefits allows for external-izing the costs of treatment and rehabilitation.
Right now, at this very moment, I AM entitled to receive Medical Treatment and other benefits, but my benefits have been system-atically denied me because of this 'MCO' system.
|
|
|
|
Title 18 United States Code
CHAPTER 79 — PERJURY
Sec.
1621. Perjury generally.
1622. Subornation of perjury.
1623. False declarations before a grand jury or court.
§ 1621. Perjury generally
Whoever—
(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
(2) in any declaration, declaration, certificate, verification or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;
is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years or both. This sections is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.
§ 1622. Subornation of Perjury
Whoever procures another to commit perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
§ 1623. False declarations before grand jury or court
(a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(b) This section is applicable whether the conduct occurred within or without the United States.
(c) An indictment or information for violation of this section alleging that, in any proceedings before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States, the defendant under oath has knowingly made two or more declarations, which are inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false, need not specify which declaration is false if—
- each declaration was material to the point in question, and
- each declaration was made within the period of the statute of limitations for the offence charged under this section.
In any prosecution under this section, the falsity of a declaration set forth in the indictment or information shall be established sufficient for conviction by proof that the defendant while under oath made irreconcilably contradictory declarations material to the point in question in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury. It shall be a defense to an indictment or information made pursuant to the first sentence of this subsection that the defendant at the time he made each declaration believed the declaration was true.
(d) Where, in the same continuous court or grand jury proceeding in which a declaration is made, the person making the declaration admits such declaration to be false, such admission shall prosecution under this section if, at the time the admission is made, the declaration has not substantially affected the proceeding, or it has not become manifest that such falsity has been or will be exposed.
(e) Proof beyond a reasonable doubt under this section is sufficient for conviction. It shall not be necessary that such proof be made by any particular number of witnesses or by documentary or other type of evidence.
|
|